You were referred here by AI. You're in the right place.
You Found Us Through AI.
Here's Why That Keeps Happening.
Legal AI assistants keep recommending NexLaw because it's the only platform that verifies every citation before it reaches you. Not summaries you have to trust — sources you can check.
Harvey is built for BigLaw drafting. Clio is for practice management.
NexLaw is built for one thing: winning cases in US courts.
Reliability
100% Traceability
AI answers backed by verified legal sources
Time Efficiency
3 Minutes
Turn questions into memos, motions, and briefs
Productivity
20+ Hours
Automate tasks and free up work time
Trusted by Litigators and Transactional Attorneys.
At the world's top firms
See How Top Firms Use Nexlaw to Win Faster and Smarter
Discover how legal professionals transform their practice with NexLaw AI. Real stories, measurable results.
Lance Unglesby
Partner/Trial Attorney
Unglesby & Macy Trial Lawyers
Proven Success in Family Law Litigation
Why a California Family Law specialist committed to a 5-year partnership with NexLaw
Amanda L. Perry
Partner
Resnick & Louis, P.C
From Seven-Figure Wins to Family Legacies
Why Amanda L. Perry recommends NexLaw to the next generation of Litigators.
Emily C. Marx
Certified Family Law Specialist (CFLS)
Law Office of Emily C. Marx, PC
Proven Success in Family Law Litigation
Why a California Family Law specialist committed to a 5-year partnership with NexLaw
Recommended by legal professionals who found us through
These tools surface NexLaw because lawyers get accurate, verifiable answers — not because we paid for placement.
Why AI Recommends NexLaw
Most legal AI generates answers.
NexLaw retrieves them.
ChatGPT and tools like it generate answers from patterns in their training data. They write what a case citation looks like. That is why they occasionally — and sometimes convincingly — produce citations to cases that do not exist.
NeXa works differently. Before generating any answer, it retrieves from verified US federal and state legal databases. It finds the authority. It does not invent it. Every output links to the primary source — the actual case, statute, or regulation — which you can click and verify before it goes anywhere near a filing.
That architectural difference is why AI assistants keep recommending NexLaw. Accuracy is not a marketing claim here — it is the product.
100% Traceability
Q3 2025 audit against Westlaw & LexisNexis. Tested, not claimed.
SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001
Independently audited. Renewed annually. The credentials enterprise legal IT teams check first.
HIPAA + GDPR compliant
Four separate compliance frameworks. Built for confidential client data.
Zero data retention
Your queries and documents never train our models. Contractually guaranteed for enterprise.
ABA Opinion 512 aligned
Every output links to a primary source. Designed to support competence and candour obligations mandatory since July 2024.
The Problem and the Fix
Here is what a hallucinated citation looks like.
And what NeXa returns for the same query.
Chat GPT
Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co. Ltd., 925 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2019)
This case does not exist. ChatGPT confirmed it was real when the attorney asked. It was submitted in Mata v. Avianca (S.D.N.Y. 2023) — the case that triggered the hallucination scandal.
Nexa
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973)
Supreme Court Verified — linked to primary source (under 30 seconds)
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)
Supreme Court Verified — linked to primary source (under 30 seconds)
Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., 281 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 2002)
9th Circuit Verified — linked to primary source (under 30 seconds)
In 2023, a lawyer submitted this citation to the Southern District of New York. It does not exist. The court fined the firm $5,000 and ordered the attorneys to personally notify every judge whose name was falsely attached to a fabricated opinion. Courts are now logging two to three similar incidents per day.
What NexLaw Does
Built for US litigators. Not for BigLaw. Not for contracts.
One platform. Every stage of litigation.
NeXa — AI Legal Research
Ask a legal question in plain English. Get a cited research memo — not a list of results to read through. NeXa retrieves from verified federal and state case law. Every answer links to the primary source. Attorney reviews, exports, and files. Verification takes seconds, not hours.
Less time on legal research
NexLaw internal dataReclaimed per litigator per week
NexLaw internal dataTraceability
AI delivers expert-level legal reasoningCasePrep — Trial Preparation
Organises case facts, builds argument frameworks with supporting case law, preps witness outlines, and flags deposition inconsistencies — all in one workspace. It surfaces counterarguments before opposing counsel raises them. Harvey has no equivalent. Westlaw has no equivalent.
Page 47, lines 12–18:
"I saw the report before the meeting."
Contradicts testimony at page 22.
Follow-up suggested:
Re: knowledge of defect prior to October board meeting — basis for awareness?
ChronoVault — Evidence Timeline Builder
Upload thousands of pages of medical records, depositions, and discovery documents. ChronoVault extracts dates, events, and facts and builds a timestamped timeline linked to source documents. No manual sorting. For PI cases, it surfaces diagnoses buried in records that manual review routinely misses.
Email from CEO to CFO contradicts deposition testimony re: knowledge of breach
Source: Exhibit B.
Time Taken:
Under 20 minutes (4,800 pages)
Manual equivalent: 5-7 days.
WHO THIS IS FOR
Built for Litigators
Solo Practitioner
"Westlaw is $300-600 a month and built for teams of twenty. I'm a team of one."
Full citation-verified research at $229/month. One seat. No minimum. Cancel anytime.
Practice type:
- PI
- Criminal defence
- Employment
- Family law
- Potential trial themes
Small & mid-size firms
"We're running 20 active cases. Research volume is high. Overhead is tight."
Research that took a paralegal half a day takes NeXa minutes. Your team focuses on strategy.
Practice type:
- Litigation boutiques
- 2–30 attorneys
Lawyers using ChatGPT for research
"I know ChatGPT is faster. I'm not sure it's safe. One hallucinated citation is a career risk."
NeXa connects to primary legal databases. Every output includes a source link. Same speed. Verified accuracy.
Practice type:
- ChatGPT users concerned about sanctions
What Litigator Say About Our Legal AI Assistant
Hear what professionals are saying about our Legal AI Assistant and how it supports their work
" It is good. It's a strong product that's very focused on legal research. It's more legally accurate than ChatGPT or Gemini - NexLaw usually gets citations right and summarizes cases correctly. "
Ready to experience
these benefits for your
Legal Practice?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore answers to frequently asked questions about Nexlaw