NEW JERSEY LITIGATION SUPPORT

Is Your Motion Practice Ready
for the Verbal Threshold Defense?

See how NexLaw drafts a defensible Opposition Brief analyzing NJSA 39:6A-8, L4-L5 Herniations,
and Gap in Treatment arguments in under 5 minutes.

platform.nexlaw.ai

Trusted by thousands of exceptional lawyers.

At the world's top firms

Foley's List
Mayer LLP
Government of Western Australia
Clayton Utz
Allens
Morgan Lewis Bockius
Piper Alderman
Shearn Delamore
Sourthern Arizona Legal Aid
Will M. Helixon
K&L Gates
Foley's List
Mayer LLP
Government of Western Australia
Clayton Utz
Allens
Morgan Lewis Bockius
Piper Alderman
Shearn Delamore
Sourthern Arizona Legal Aid
Will M. Helixon
K&L Gates

What You Get With 1 Credit of Deep Research

Case Analysis: NJ Verbal Threshold Opposition & Gap in Treatment

Example Prompt: Research and draft an opposition to a Verbal Threshold motion where the client has an L4-L5 herniation and a gap in treatment caused by PIP termination.

Deep Research ID: 9465 | 1 Credit Used

Deep Research ID: 9465 | 1 Credit Used

8-Page

Opposition Memorandum

A fully drafted "Opposition to Summary Judgment" legal argument. Includes specific analysis on L4-L5 herniations, "Objective Medical Evidence," and counter-arguments for insurance-based gaps in treatment.

12+

NJ Appellate Citations

Pinpoint citations to Pommells v. Perez, DiProspero, and recent unpublished opinions like Kelly A. Scott, proving that a gap in treatment is a question for the jury, not grounds for dismissal.

5

Statutes & Legislations

Detailed statutory mapping of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8 (Verbal Threshold) and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 (PIP Benefits), linking the termination of benefits directly to the justification for treatment gaps.

8

Legal Doctrines Verified

Automatic "Shepardizing" of key doctrines. Confirms that "Serious Lifestyle Impact" is Overturned while "Objective Clinical Evidence" remains Good Law, ensuring your motion is defensible.

NexLaw vs Other AI Tools: Credit Efficiency

Other AI Tools

50+

Queries/Credits Needed

Multiple prompts to piece together partial analysis

VS

NexLaw Deep Research

1

Credit = 1 Prompt

8-page comprehensive report

NexLaw's AI is engineered for maximum efficiency—delivering complete analysis in a single prompt instead of requiring dozens of queries.

Ready to experience these benefits for your legal practice?

Schedule Your Custom Demo

*By submitting the form, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Testimonials

What Litigators Say About Our Legal AI Assistant

Will M. Helixon profile photo
Will M. Helixon
Founder & Attorney, Military Law Specialist
Law Office of Will M. Helixon
US
"After 31 years in military law and 150+ jury trials, I approached NexLaw with healthy skepticism. The platform exceeded my high expectations fundamentally changing how my team approaches research and case preparation. The TrialPrep feature has become indispensable, elevating our trial readiness to new heights."

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Does NexLaw actually understand New Jersey State Law, or is it just general federal law?

NexLaw is specifically tuned for New Jersey state practice. Unlike generic tools, our engine indexes Title 39 (Motor Vehicles), Title 59 (Tort Claims Act), and NJ Court Rules (R. 4:46). It understands the nuance of state-specific doctrines like the "Verbal Threshold" (AICRA) and distinguishing "subjective" vs. "objective" medical evidence under DiProspero and Serrano.

Can I trust the case citations, or will it "hallucinate" fake cases?

We prioritize accuracy over creativity. NexLaw verifies every citation against real case law databases, prioritizing recent NJ Appellate Division and Supreme Court rulings. That said though, we still encourage lawyers to work with NexLaw in ensuring the citation accuracy.

My client’s medical records are sensitive (PHI). Is it safe to upload them?

Yes. We are SOC 2 Type II compliant and use end-to-end encryption. Critical for PI lawyers: We offer a "Zero Retention" mode where your uploaded medical chronologies and deposition transcripts are analyzed for the report and then immediately wiped from our inference engine. We never train our public models on your client's confidential case files.

How is this different from using ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is a generalist chatbot; NexLaw is a litigation engine.

  • ChatGPT might tell you to apply federal "Daubert" standards to a NJ state case.
  • NexLaw knows to apply the "Kemp/Rubanick" standard for expert admissibility in NJ.
  • NexLaw drafts in the format of a legal memorandum or brief (Point I, Point II), ready to copy-paste into your Motion for Summary Judgment.

Does NexLaw cover both federal and state case law in the U.S.?

Yes. NexLaw provides access to federal and state case law, statutes, and regulations, helping attorneys conduct comprehensive legal research in one search. This coverage allows litigators to prepare across multiple jurisdictions without switching platforms.

Can NexLaw help attorneys find and analyze legal precedents?

Yes. NexLaw's AI-powered legal research quickly identifies relevant precedents, statutes, and rules. Every answer is citation-backed with verifiable sources, giving attorneys confidence that results are reliable and court-ready.

What makes NexLaw different from other AI tools for lawyers?

Unlike generic AI platforms, NexLaw is built exclusively for litigation and legal professionals. It combines case law research, trial prep tools, and secure document handling into one end-to-end system. With features like ChronoVault timelines and NeXa legal research, NexLaw goes beyond chat to deliver court-ready insights and workflows.

CTA Image
Elevate Your
Litigation Strategy
Book Your Demo
NEXLAW AI