NEW YORK LITIGATION SUPPORT
Is Your Opposition Ready
for the "Serious Injury"
Threshold?
See how NexLaw drafts a CPLR 2106 Affirmation analyzing
Insurance Law § 5102(d),
Gap in Treatment (Pommells), and Goniometer findings in under 5 minutes.
ISO 27001 Certified
GDPR Compliant
HIPAA Compliant
Type II CertifiedTrusted By US Litigators & Trial Teams.
At the world’s top firm














What You Get With 1 Credit of Deep Research
Case Analysis: NY "Serious Injury" Affirmation & Gap in Treatment
Example Prompt: Draft an Affirmation in Opposition to a § 5102(d) Summary Judgment motion where the plaintiff has a torn meniscus and a gap in treatment explained by No-Fault termination.
Deep Research ID: 9470 | 1 Credit Used
Deep Research ID: 94270 | 1 Credit Used
6-Page
Medical Affirmation (CPLR 2106)
A fully drafted "Opposition to Summary Judgment" legal argument. Includes specific analysis on L4-L5 herniation, "Objective Medical Evidence," and counter-arguments for insurance-based gaps in treatment.
17+
NY Precedents Cited
Pinpoint citations to Pommells v. Perez and Perl v. Meher, specifically arguing that the termination of No-Fault benefits is a valid, non-medical explanation for a gap in treatment.
3
Statutes & Rules
Checks against Insurance Law § 5102(d) categories (Permanent Consequential Limitation, 90/180 Day Rule), and formats the output as a CPLR 2106 Affirmation with penalty of perjury.
7
Doctrines Verified
Verifies that the "Gap in Treatment" doctrine is Not Overturned and applies the "Conflicting Expert Testimony" rule (Toure v. Avis, 98 N.Y.2d 345) to create a triable issue of fact for the jury.
NexLaw vs Other AI Tools: Credit Efficiency
Other AI Tools
Queries/Credits Needed
Multiple prompts to piece together partial analysis
NexLaw Deep Research
Credit = 1 Prompt
6-page comprehensive report
NexLaw's AI is engineered for maximum efficiency—delivering complete analysis in a single prompt instead of requiring dozens of queries.
Ready to experience these benefits for your legal practice?
Schedule Your Custom Demo
Download NeXa Deep Research Analysis
See the unfiltered, courtroom-ready output from a single NeXa credit. This is the 20-hour work product that proves the power and accuracy of our AI.

" It is good. It's a strong product that's very focused on legal research. It's more legally accurate than ChatGPT or Gemini - NexLaw usually gets citations right and summarizes cases correctly. "
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore answers to frequently asked questions about Nexlaw